Nice animi BOB.
Bob Hughes <per### [at] aol com?subject=PoV-News:> wrote in message
news:3909dec9@news.povray.org...
> Hi everyone. Just wanted to post here that a final (well, you know)
> rendition of the Tornado is on it's way and should be done approximately
14 hours
> from now (taking 30 hours maybe).
> In the meantime I have the first 49 frames put together into a Mpeg at:
> http://members.aol.com/persistenceofv/anims.htm
> If you have seen this before it's looking much better I think, so thanks
to a few people
> :-)
> I'm only going to have it loop nice as possible instead of move around too
much
> and this one already looks pretty much like what the final result will
except it's not
> looping yet.
> I tried what Rick [Kitty5] has said and viewed it full screen and it's not
such a bad way
> to play animations I guess. Went from 240X180 expanded up to 1152X864 so
I do
> have to get away from the monitor.
> Since on the subject of Mpeg animations, I noticed I had jerky frames when
using
> VideoMach 2 and very smooth animations made from Cmpeg. Anyone know about
> that? I thought it could be a data rate thing or something but I haven't
figured it out;
> I used Mpeg-1 standard and the other rates only hasten the animation.
> VM2 has much less artifacting though.
>
> Bob
> --
> omniVerse http://users.aol.com/persistenceofv/all.htm
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|